Primentra vs Semarchy xDM

Pricing

What you actually pay

Feature comparison

Primentra vs Semarchy xDM — what each platform covers

In depth

How Primentra and Semarchy xDM differ once you get past the feature list.

What is Semarchy xDM?

Semarchy xDM is a no-code master data management platform founded in France and now headquartered in Atlanta. It covers MDM, reference data management (RDM), and application data management (ADM) in a single unified platform. The design interface is web-based and largely drag-and-drop — data stewards and IT staff can define entities, configure matching rules, and build forms without writing code. Semarchy was named a Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader for Master Data Management in 2021, which is a meaningful credential in this market.

The platform's primary strengths are its AI/ML-assisted matching engine for deduplication and golden record creation, its approval workflow system, and its ability to generate data management applications from configuration rather than code. Semarchy targets mid-market and enterprise buyers, with a particular presence in healthcare and retail. Their stated implementation time is under 12 weeks, which positions them well against the 3–12 month timelines typical of platforms like Informatica or SAP MDG.

The per-user subscription model starts at approximately $360 per user per year. That is meaningfully lower than most enterprise MDM platforms, and the no-code approach reduces dependency on professional services. For teams that need AI-assisted matching across large, messy datasets — think consolidating customer records from six acquired companies — Semarchy is a serious tool that earns its position in the market.

What is Primentra?

Primentra is a self-hosted MDM platform built on SQL Server. We designed it for mid-market teams who manage reference and master data in structured hierarchies — the product codes, cost centers, supplier lists, and location codes that downstream systems like ERP and BI tools depend on. The architecture is straightforward: Models contain Entities, Entities contain Attributes. Data stewards edit records in an Excel-like grid with keyboard shortcuts and clipboard paste. Changesets handle approvals. Integration views expose clean data to downstream systems. Everything runs on the SQL Server instance you already own.

We built Primentra specifically because Microsoft deprecated MDS from SQL Server 2025, leaving mid-market teams with an awkward choice: pay enterprise prices for Semarchy or Profisee, or keep patching a system with a hard end-of-life date. Primentra includes a built-in MDS migration wizard for exactly that reason — see the full migration guide for what the process looks like. The price is €7,500/year, flat, with no per-user fees and no limits on models, entities, or data volume.

Setup and time to value

Both platforms position themselves as fast to implement relative to enterprise MDM — and that positioning is fair for both. Semarchy's under-12-week claim reflects faster delivery compared to an Informatica or SAP MDG project. Our team has seen real Semarchy implementations land in that window when the scope is clear and the customer has dedicated stewards available.

Primentra's under-one-day claim is a different category of claim. We mean it literally: download the installer, run the SQL deployment script against your SQL Server instance, log in, start defining your models. No consultants, no kickoff calls, no environment provisioning queue. The difference is that Semarchy's configuration layer — no-code as it is — still requires someone to understand the platform's concepts before you can build production-grade entity models. Primentra is narrower in scope, which means less to learn before you're productive.

Daily data editing experience

Semarchy generates web forms for data entry based on your entity configuration. It's flexible — you can tailor the layout, add business rules, build validation logic. For data stewards who process records one at a time or work through an approval queue, the generated forms work well.

Primentra's editing model is deliberately different. The primary interface is an Excel-like data grid with keyboard navigation, tab-to-next-cell, and paste-from-clipboard support. If your team manages thousands of reference data records and regularly imports updates from spreadsheets, the grid model is significantly faster than form-based entry. We built it this way because most data stewards we talked to already live in Excel — they want a tool that feels like an upgrade from Excel, not a departure from it.

Pricing and total cost of ownership

This is where the Semarchy xDM vs Primentra comparison gets concrete. Semarchy's per-user pricing means your cost scales directly with headcount. At roughly $360 per user per year:

• 20 users: ~$7,200/year
• 50 users: ~$18,000/year
• 100 users: ~$36,000/year

Primentra is €7,500/year regardless of user count. At 20 users the two platforms are roughly equivalent. At 50 users, Semarchy is already 2.4x more expensive. At 100 users, it's close to 5x. And this is before factoring in professional services: Semarchy implementations, while faster than enterprise MDM, often still involve consulting days for entity modeling and workflow configuration. Primentra is designed to require none.

The honest caveat: Semarchy's published pricing is a starting point. Actual contract pricing varies, and larger deals often include discounts. Treat the per-user figures above as directional, not exact. The structural point — that per-user models become expensive as teams grow — holds regardless.

Deployment model

Semarchy xDM runs in the cloud or on-premise. That flexibility is an advantage for organizations that want a SaaS delivery model or are already heavily cloud-hosted. Semarchy's cloud option means less infrastructure to manage internally.

Primentra is on-premise only. Your data stays on your own SQL Server — on your own hardware or private cloud infrastructure, inside your own network perimeter. For organizations in regulated industries — healthcare, financial services, manufacturing with export controls — keeping master data off third-party cloud infrastructure is often not optional. Primentra was built for exactly that constraint.

MDS migration path

Microsoft removed MDS from SQL Server 2025. If you're still on MDS, you need a plan. Our MDS alternatives roundup covers the full landscape if you are still evaluating. This is an area where the two platforms diverge clearly: Primentra includes a purpose-built MDS migration wizard. Run a single SQL query against your existing MDS database, export your models and entity data as JSON, upload that file into Primentra, and your entire structure — models, entities, attributes, domain values, hierarchies — is imported in minutes.

Semarchy does not offer a dedicated MDS migration tool. Migrating from MDS to Semarchy involves manually rebuilding your entity model in Semarchy's design interface and re-importing data through ETL. That is not an insurmountable problem, but it is more work and more consulting time than Primentra's wizard approach.

No-code vs focused simplicity

Semarchy markets heavily on its no-code application generation capability — the idea that business users can build data management apps without involving developers. That is a real capability and a meaningful differentiator for organizations that want to build multiple custom MDM applications on top of the platform.

Primentra takes a different approach: instead of a flexible platform that can generate arbitrary apps, we built a focused product that does one thing well. You define models and entities through the admin panel, data stewards edit records in the grid, changesets handle approvals, integration views expose data to downstream systems. There is less to configure, which means less to learn, fewer places for configuration errors, and a faster path to a working system for teams that want MDM — not a custom app-building platform.

Semarchy's breadth is an advantage if you need its full feature set. If you need MDM for reference and master data with a fast setup and predictable annual cost, that same breadth translates into configuration complexity you may not need.

Which one is right for you?

Frequently asked questions